Workshop-Wiki · Englisch

GitOps Solution: Fundamentals (EN)

This solution guide belongs to the assessment Fundamentals. It does not provide one rigid answer; it defines verifiable answer criteria.

Workshop-Beispiele als ZIP
Lernstand in der Web-App

Kapitel als gelesen markieren, Lesefortschritt sehen und Praxismodule abhaken: Diese Funktionen stehen nach Aktivierung der optionalen Web-App zur Verfügung. Der Workshop-Fortschritt ergibt sich automatisch aus den Kapiteln aller Dokumentseiten. Deine Auswahl bleibt auf diesem Gerät; es gibt kein Konto und keinen Serverabgleich. Eine Installation ist nicht erforderlich. Beim Widerruf in den Datenschutz-Einstellungen wird der Lernstand gelöscht.

Lesefortschritt0%
0%
0 / 6 Kapitel gelesen
Weitere SprachfassungDeutsch ↗Griechisch ↗

GitOps Solution: Fundamentals (EN)

This solution guide belongs to the assessment Fundamentals. It does not provide one rigid answer; it defines verifiable answer criteria.

Grading Rubric

Area Expectation
Principles Declarative, versioned, automatically pulled and continuously reconciled are applied correctly.
Evidence Answers name source, commit, rendering, controller and status evidence.
Operations Drift, promotion, rollback, multi-tenancy and observability are covered.
Security Secrets, RBAC, policy, signatures and supply chain are assessed.
01 / 06

Sample Criteria

Solution 01: OpenGitOps-Prinzipien

A strong answer for OpenGitOps-Prinzipien names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 02: gewünschter Zustand

A strong answer for gewünschter Zustand names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 03: Git als Quelle

A strong answer for Git als Quelle names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 04: Kubernetes-Manifeste

A strong answer for Kubernetes-Manifeste names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 05: Reconciliation

A strong answer for Reconciliation names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 06: Drift

A strong answer for Drift names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 07: OpenGitOps-Prinzipien

A strong answer for OpenGitOps-Prinzipien names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 08: gewünschter Zustand

A strong answer for gewünschter Zustand names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 09: Git als Quelle

A strong answer for Git als Quelle names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 10: Kubernetes-Manifeste

A strong answer for Kubernetes-Manifeste names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 11: Reconciliation

A strong answer for Reconciliation names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 12: Drift

A strong answer for Drift names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 13: OpenGitOps-Prinzipien

A strong answer for OpenGitOps-Prinzipien names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 14: gewünschter Zustand

A strong answer for gewünschter Zustand names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 15: Git als Quelle

A strong answer for Git als Quelle names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 16: Kubernetes-Manifeste

A strong answer for Kubernetes-Manifeste names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 17: Reconciliation

A strong answer for Reconciliation names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 18: Drift

A strong answer for Drift names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 19: OpenGitOps-Prinzipien

A strong answer for OpenGitOps-Prinzipien names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 20: gewünschter Zustand

A strong answer for gewünschter Zustand names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 21: Git als Quelle

A strong answer for Git als Quelle names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 22: Kubernetes-Manifeste

A strong answer for Kubernetes-Manifeste names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 23: Reconciliation

A strong answer for Reconciliation names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 24: Drift

A strong answer for Drift names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 25: OpenGitOps-Prinzipien

A strong answer for OpenGitOps-Prinzipien names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 26: gewünschter Zustand

A strong answer for gewünschter Zustand names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 27: Git als Quelle

A strong answer for Git als Quelle names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 28: Kubernetes-Manifeste

A strong answer for Kubernetes-Manifeste names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 29: Reconciliation

A strong answer for Reconciliation names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 30: Drift

A strong answer for Drift names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 31: OpenGitOps-Prinzipien

A strong answer for OpenGitOps-Prinzipien names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 32: gewünschter Zustand

A strong answer for gewünschter Zustand names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 33: Git als Quelle

A strong answer for Git als Quelle names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 34: Kubernetes-Manifeste

A strong answer for Kubernetes-Manifeste names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 35: Reconciliation

A strong answer for Reconciliation names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 36: Drift

A strong answer for Drift names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 37: OpenGitOps-Prinzipien

A strong answer for OpenGitOps-Prinzipien names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 38: gewünschter Zustand

A strong answer for gewünschter Zustand names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 39: Git als Quelle

A strong answer for Git als Quelle names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 40: Kubernetes-Manifeste

A strong answer for Kubernetes-Manifeste names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.
02 / 06

Review Checklist for Fundamentals Solution

  • 01. document desired state: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 02. identify source and commit: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 03. explain reconciliation path: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 04. prove drift: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 05. check Kustomize or Helm rendering: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 06. read Argo CD or Flux resource: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 07. assess promotion risk: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 08. write down rollback path: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 09. mark secret boundary: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 10. check RBAC and tenant boundary: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 11. name policy impact: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 12. describe feedback loop: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 13. document desired state: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 14. identify source and commit: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 15. explain reconciliation path: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 16. prove drift: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 17. check Kustomize or Helm rendering: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 18. read Argo CD or Flux resource: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 19. assess promotion risk: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 20. write down rollback path: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 21. mark secret boundary: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 22. check RBAC and tenant boundary: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 23. name policy impact: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 24. describe feedback loop: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 25. document desired state: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 26. identify source and commit: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 27. explain reconciliation path: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 28. prove drift: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 29. check Kustomize or Helm rendering: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 30. read Argo CD or Flux resource: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 31. assess promotion risk: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 32. write down rollback path: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 33. mark secret boundary: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 34. check RBAC and tenant boundary: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
03 / 06

Practice Appendix: Fundamentals Solution

This appendix provides a backlog for longer trainings, reviews and repetition. Each task is small enough to verify with local YAML artifacts and a Git repository.

A001. OpenGitOps-Prinzipien

  • Task: document desired state and explicitly relate the observation to OpenGitOps-Prinzipien.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A002. gewünschter Zustand

  • Task: identify source and commit and explicitly relate the observation to gewünschter Zustand.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A003. Git als Quelle

  • Task: explain reconciliation path and explicitly relate the observation to Git als Quelle.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A004. Kubernetes-Manifeste

  • Task: prove drift and explicitly relate the observation to Kubernetes-Manifeste.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A005. Reconciliation

  • Task: check Kustomize or Helm rendering and explicitly relate the observation to Reconciliation.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A006. Drift

  • Task: read Argo CD or Flux resource and explicitly relate the observation to Drift.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A007. GitOps

  • Task: assess promotion risk and explicitly relate the observation to GitOps.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A008. Desired State

  • Task: write down rollback path and explicitly relate the observation to Desired State.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A009. Actual State

  • Task: mark secret boundary and explicitly relate the observation to Actual State.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A010. Reconciliation

  • Task: check RBAC and tenant boundary and explicitly relate the observation to Reconciliation.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A011. Drift

  • Task: name policy impact and explicitly relate the observation to Drift.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A012. Source of Truth

  • Task: describe feedback loop and explicitly relate the observation to Source of Truth.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A013. Pull Model

  • Task: document desired state and explicitly relate the observation to Pull Model.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A014. Argo CD Application

  • Task: identify source and commit and explicitly relate the observation to Argo CD Application.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A015. Argo CD AppProject

  • Task: explain reconciliation path and explicitly relate the observation to Argo CD AppProject.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A016. Flux Source

  • Task: prove drift and explicitly relate the observation to Flux Source.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A017. Flux Kustomization

  • Task: check Kustomize or Helm rendering and explicitly relate the observation to Flux Kustomization.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A018. HelmRelease

  • Task: read Argo CD or Flux resource and explicitly relate the observation to HelmRelease.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A019. Kustomize Overlay

  • Task: assess promotion risk and explicitly relate the observation to Kustomize Overlay.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A020. Promotion

  • Task: write down rollback path and explicitly relate the observation to Promotion.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A021. Progressive Delivery

  • Task: mark secret boundary and explicitly relate the observation to Progressive Delivery.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A022. Secret Management

  • Task: check RBAC and tenant boundary and explicitly relate the observation to Secret Management.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A023. OpenGitOps-Prinzipien

  • Task: name policy impact and explicitly relate the observation to OpenGitOps-Prinzipien.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A024. gewünschter Zustand

  • Task: describe feedback loop and explicitly relate the observation to gewünschter Zustand.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A025. Git als Quelle

  • Task: document desired state and explicitly relate the observation to Git als Quelle.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A026. Kubernetes-Manifeste

  • Task: identify source and commit and explicitly relate the observation to Kubernetes-Manifeste.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A027. Reconciliation

  • Task: explain reconciliation path and explicitly relate the observation to Reconciliation.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A028. Drift

  • Task: prove drift and explicitly relate the observation to Drift.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A029. GitOps

  • Task: check Kustomize or Helm rendering and explicitly relate the observation to GitOps.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A030. Desired State

  • Task: read Argo CD or Flux resource and explicitly relate the observation to Desired State.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A031. Actual State

  • Task: assess promotion risk and explicitly relate the observation to Actual State.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A032. Reconciliation

  • Task: write down rollback path and explicitly relate the observation to Reconciliation.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A033. Drift

  • Task: mark secret boundary and explicitly relate the observation to Drift.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A034. Source of Truth

  • Task: check RBAC and tenant boundary and explicitly relate the observation to Source of Truth.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A035. Pull Model

  • Task: name policy impact and explicitly relate the observation to Pull Model.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A036. Argo CD Application

  • Task: describe feedback loop and explicitly relate the observation to Argo CD Application.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A037. Argo CD AppProject

  • Task: document desired state and explicitly relate the observation to Argo CD AppProject.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A038. Flux Source

  • Task: identify source and commit and explicitly relate the observation to Flux Source.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A039. Flux Kustomization

  • Task: explain reconciliation path and explicitly relate the observation to Flux Kustomization.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A040. HelmRelease

  • Task: prove drift and explicitly relate the observation to HelmRelease.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A041. Kustomize Overlay

  • Task: check Kustomize or Helm rendering and explicitly relate the observation to Kustomize Overlay.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A042. Promotion

  • Task: read Argo CD or Flux resource and explicitly relate the observation to Promotion.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A043. Progressive Delivery

  • Task: assess promotion risk and explicitly relate the observation to Progressive Delivery.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A044. Secret Management

  • Task: write down rollback path and explicitly relate the observation to Secret Management.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A045. OpenGitOps-Prinzipien

  • Task: mark secret boundary and explicitly relate the observation to OpenGitOps-Prinzipien.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A046. gewünschter Zustand

  • Task: check RBAC and tenant boundary and explicitly relate the observation to gewünschter Zustand.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A047. Git als Quelle

  • Task: name policy impact and explicitly relate the observation to Git als Quelle.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A048. Kubernetes-Manifeste

  • Task: describe feedback loop and explicitly relate the observation to Kubernetes-Manifeste.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A049. Reconciliation

  • Task: document desired state and explicitly relate the observation to Reconciliation.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A050. Drift

  • Task: identify source and commit and explicitly relate the observation to Drift.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A051. GitOps

  • Task: explain reconciliation path and explicitly relate the observation to GitOps.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A052. Desired State

  • Task: prove drift and explicitly relate the observation to Desired State.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A053. Actual State

  • Task: check Kustomize or Helm rendering and explicitly relate the observation to Actual State.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A054. Reconciliation

  • Task: read Argo CD or Flux resource and explicitly relate the observation to Reconciliation.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A055. Drift

  • Task: assess promotion risk and explicitly relate the observation to Drift.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A056. Source of Truth

  • Task: write down rollback path and explicitly relate the observation to Source of Truth.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A057. Pull Model

  • Task: mark secret boundary and explicitly relate the observation to Pull Model.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A058. Argo CD Application

  • Task: check RBAC and tenant boundary and explicitly relate the observation to Argo CD Application.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A059. Argo CD AppProject

  • Task: name policy impact and explicitly relate the observation to Argo CD AppProject.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A060. Flux Source

  • Task: describe feedback loop and explicitly relate the observation to Flux Source.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A061. Flux Kustomization

  • Task: document desired state and explicitly relate the observation to Flux Kustomization.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A062. HelmRelease

  • Task: identify source and commit and explicitly relate the observation to HelmRelease.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A063. Kustomize Overlay

  • Task: explain reconciliation path and explicitly relate the observation to Kustomize Overlay.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A064. Promotion

  • Task: prove drift and explicitly relate the observation to Promotion.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A065. Progressive Delivery

  • Task: check Kustomize or Helm rendering and explicitly relate the observation to Progressive Delivery.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A066. Secret Management

  • Task: read Argo CD or Flux resource and explicitly relate the observation to Secret Management.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A067. OpenGitOps-Prinzipien

  • Task: assess promotion risk and explicitly relate the observation to OpenGitOps-Prinzipien.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A068. gewünschter Zustand

  • Task: write down rollback path and explicitly relate the observation to gewünschter Zustand.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A069. Git als Quelle

  • Task: mark secret boundary and explicitly relate the observation to Git als Quelle.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A070. Kubernetes-Manifeste

  • Task: check RBAC and tenant boundary and explicitly relate the observation to Kubernetes-Manifeste.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A071. Reconciliation

  • Task: name policy impact and explicitly relate the observation to Reconciliation.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A072. Drift

  • Task: describe feedback loop and explicitly relate the observation to Drift.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A073. GitOps

  • Task: document desired state and explicitly relate the observation to GitOps.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A074. Desired State

  • Task: identify source and commit and explicitly relate the observation to Desired State.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.
04 / 06

Official Sources and Scope

The material is aligned with public GitOps and Kubernetes documentation. Argo CD, Flux, Kustomize, Helm, policy controllers and secret tools are positioned where they represent common GitOps workflows. An example artifact is not an installation promise for a specific cluster.

  • OpenGitOps: https://opengitops.dev/
  • OpenGitOps Principles: https://github.com/open-gitops/documents/blob/main/PRINCIPLES.md
  • Argo CD Documentation: https://argo-cd.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
  • Argo CD Declarative Setup: https://argo-cd.readthedocs.io/en/stable/operator-manual/declarative-setup/
  • Argo CD Project Page: https://argoproj.github.io/cd/
  • Flux Documentation: https://fluxcd.io/flux/
  • Flux Core Concepts: https://fluxcd.io/flux/concepts/
  • CNCF GitOps Certified Associate (CGOA): https://www.cncf.io/training/certification/cgoa/
  • Linux Foundation Certified GitOps Associate (CGOA): https://training.linuxfoundation.org/certification/certified-gitops-associate-cgoa/
05 / 06

Additional Review Drills

Use these drills when the primary task is complete and the learner needs another pass over operational reasoning. They are intentionally evidence-oriented and can be answered with local GitOps artifacts.

Drill 01: desired state

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by desired state.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 02: source commit

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by source commit.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 03: reconciliation

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by reconciliation.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 04: drift

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by drift.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 05: Argo CD Application

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by Argo CD Application.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 06: Flux Kustomization

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by Flux Kustomization.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 07: Kustomize overlay

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by Kustomize overlay.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 08: HelmRelease

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by HelmRelease.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 09: secret management

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by secret management.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 10: RBAC boundary

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by RBAC boundary.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 11: policy gate

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by policy gate.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 12: rollback

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by rollback.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 13: desired state

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by desired state.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 14: source commit

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by source commit.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 15: reconciliation

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by reconciliation.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 16: drift

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by drift.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.
06 / 06

GOP · Orthevs Academy

31 Module als durchgängiger Lernpfad.

Die Reihenfolge bleibt unverändert: von der Laborgrundstruktur über fachliche Grundlagen und Betriebsmodelle bis zum abschließenden Troubleshooting. Die technischen Verzeichnisnamen werden bewusst beibehalten.

Orthevs – Engineering als Grundlage für das, was als Nächstes kommt.

Orthevs als App

Orthevs installieren

Die Orthevs Web-App kann auf unterstützten Mobilgeräten und Desktop-Browsern installiert werden.

iPhone und iPad

Öffnen Sie Orthevs in Safari. Tippen Sie auf Teilen, dann auf ‚Zum Home-Bildschirm‘. Aktivieren Sie gegebenenfalls ‚Als Web-App öffnen‘ und tippen Sie auf ‚Hinzufügen‘.

Android

Für die Web-App öffnen Sie das Browsermenü und wählen ‚App installieren‘ oder ‚Zum Startbildschirm hinzufügen‘. Bestätigen Sie die Installation.

Desktop-Browser

Öffnen Sie das Browsermenü oder das Installationssymbol in der Adressleiste und wählen Sie ‚App installieren‘ beziehungsweise ‚Zum Dock hinzufügen‘.

Die Web-App-Installation hängt vom Browser ab. Falls kein Installationsdialog erscheint, nutzen Sie die angezeigten Schritte im Browser.