Orthevs Engineering Lab · IEL

Manage infrastructure as verifiable state, from the physical site to the cloud.

The Infrastructure Engineering Lab brings together data centers, hardware, network, compute, virtualization, storage, cloud, edge, automation and operations in a domain Control Plane for reproducible infrastructure.

Documented target state · Concept / Architecture Baseline

Domain application · target architecture

Independent engineering environment

The Lab is designed as a complete domain application with a workspace, editors, models and SDK-like interfaces. Its Factories are the specialist tools; Engines handle processing and execution. Shared Contracts connect it with other Labs.

Develop infrastructure resources, networks and physical or virtual topologies.

From Engineering Contract to verifiable outcome

  1. 01

    Contract & Foundation

    Requirements and rules select the domain foundation.

  2. 02

    Lab Workspace

    Models, editors and tools address the domain problem.

  3. 03

    Factory & Engine

    Specialist tools create artifacts and use suitable execution mechanisms.

  4. 04

    Validation & Product

    Tests, evidence and approvals lead to a versioned outcome.

The workflows and capabilities shown describe the documented target model. Check availability and maturity for each release and capability.

Mission and ambition

Infrastructure becomes a versioned, plannable engineering product.

Infrastructure is more than individual servers or cloud resources. Sites, power and cooling, hardware, address spaces, networks, compute, virtualization, storage and operational services form interdependent systems. IEL keeps these dependencies, responsibilities and handovers together in a shared domain model.

The Lab describes desired and observed state, plans changes before they are executed and carries them out through provider-independent capability contracts. Existing data center, virtualization, network and cloud tools remain usable via adapters; IEL does not replace them wholesale.

The first vertical slice connects Infrastructure Blueprint, hardware inventory, DNS/IPAM, provisioning and monitoring. This not only creates a resource but also makes its identity, connectivity, operability and future changeability verifiable.

Capability map

Twelve domains structure the Infrastructure Engineering Lab.

The domains organize responsibility and lifecycles. Within them, Factories deliver clearly bounded, versionable capabilities.

1 · CFF · IBF · IRF · TDF

Infrastructure Strategy & Architecture

Define target architecture, standards, topologies and technology decisions for infrastructure products.

2 · CCF · DDF · PCF · RRF

Physical & Datacenter Infrastructure

Model sites, racks, power, cooling, cabling and hardware inventory as a reliable foundation.

3 · BMF · GAF · HIF · VHF

Compute & Virtualization Infrastructure

Manage bare metal, hypervisors, virtual machines and compute pools with capacity and lifecycle.

4 · DIF · LFF · LBPF · WCF

Network Engineering

Treat IPAM, DNS, routing, switching, load balancing and connectivity as versioned network services.

5 · BIF · DPF · FSF · SIF

Storage & Data Infrastructure

Design block, file and object storage, data paths, performance, protection classes and lifecycle.

6 · CIF · ECF · HCF · RSF

Cloud, Hybrid & Edge Infrastructure

Integrate public cloud, private cloud, hybrid topologies and edge sites through explicit provider profiles.

7 · AAF · DRF · IPF · TAF

Infrastructure Automation

Orchestrate IaC, provisioning, configuration, workflows and reconciliation under control.

8 · ALF · LMF · MOF · ROF

Observability & Operations

Correlate health, telemetry, events, diagnostics and operational states across infrastructure boundaries.

9 · DCF · DRCF · HAF · MWF

Resilience & Lifecycle

Represent backups, failover, disaster recovery, migration and decommissioning as tested procedures.

10 · HDF · ISF · PKIF · SCF

Security & Compliance

Embed segmentation, hardening requirements, access, policy and infrastructure Evidence.

11 · AMF · CMDBF · FINF · LCMF

Asset, Cost & Governance

Bring together inventory, ownership, capacity, cost, quotas and decision records.

12 · ITSMF · OSEF · PLEF · SREIF

Integration & Service Enablement

Provide infrastructure as a consumable capability for PEL, OSEL and other Labs.

Use cases

IEL starts with the complete engineering problem.

The scenarios combine several Factories into one dependable flow. They describe the documented target state, not a product function that is already committed.

1Datacenter Foundation

Capture a site as a consistent infrastructure model

Racks, power paths, hardware, cabling, address spaces and management access are inventoried and connected in a topology. Capacity and dependency checks form the basis for later provisioning.

  • Physical inventory and ownership
  • Power, network and rack dependencies
  • Capacity and lifecycle status
IBF → HIF → DCF → IPF → TOF
2Provisioning

Provision compute, network and storage from a Blueprint

An approved Infrastructure Blueprint is translated into provider-specific plans. DNS/IPAM, network segments, compute and storage are created, verified and registered as consumable resources in a defined order.

  • Plan and change diff
  • Idempotent provider operations
  • Readiness and handover
IABF → IPAMF → NPF → CVF → SIF → IMOF
3Hybrid & Edge

Operate distributed sites consistently, but not identically

Cloud, data center and edge targets use shared contracts but retain their own capability, latency and security profiles. Rollouts account for limited connectivity, local failure domains and controlled offline procedures.

  • Provider and site profiles
  • Local autonomy with central governance
  • Offline and reconnect behavior
HIF → EIF → CAF → NIF → OMF
4Lifecycle & Resilience

Bring drift, capacity limits and outages under control

Observed state is checked against the approved target design. Deviations, bottlenecks and health signals lead to a plan, an approved correction or a recovery procedure rather than uncontrolled one-off changes.

  • Freshness and drift
  • Capacity and cost context
  • Recovery and retirement Evidence
IMOF → CAPF → DGF → DRF → DCF

End-to-end lifecycle

From the requirement to the controlled next state.

IEL connects strategic planning, physical and virtual provisioning and Day 2 operations in a continuous infrastructure lifecycle.

  1. 1
    Discover

    Capture demand and inventory

    Record sites, assets, services, dependencies, owners and protection requirements.

  2. 2
    Design

    Design the topology

    Define compute, network, storage, failure domains and operational objectives as a Blueprint.

  3. 3
    Plan

    Calculate impact

    Check provider capabilities, capacity, cost, policies and change diff in advance.

  4. 4
    Approve

    Approve the change

    Present risk, scope, maintenance window and recovery procedure to accountable roles.

  5. 5
    Provision

    Create resources

    Orchestrate physical, virtual and cloud capabilities idempotently.

  6. 6
    Configure

    Connect services

    Configure network, DNS, storage, access and operational integrations.

  7. 7
    Validate

    Check readiness

    Test connectivity, capacity, security, health and handover criteria.

  8. 8
    Operate

    Observe state

    Bring together inventory, telemetry, cost, drift, incidents and SLOs.

  9. 9
    Evolve

    Adjust capacity

    Expand, migrate, patch and optimize with a new plan and Evidence.

  10. 10
    Recover

    Restore services

    Test failover, restore and alternative paths under realistic conditions.

  11. 11
    Retire

    Decommission resources

    Resolve dependencies, handle data, revoke access and retire assets.

Closed feedback loop

Observed state, capacity, cost and drift drive further evolution. Insights are not merely documented; they flow, versioned, into the next engineering cycle.

Reference architecture

Desired state, inventory and provider reality are never confused with one another.

IEL maintains a domain infrastructure model and controls execution through adapters without turning provider objects into the domain model unchecked.

Layer 1 · Shared platform services

Orthevs Platform

IAM, secrets, policy, audit, eventing, registry and artifact storage.

Layer 2 · Infrastructure Control Plane

IEL Core & API

Blueprints, topology, inventory, desired/observed state, planning, jobs and operation ledger.

Layer 3 · Domain capabilities

IEL Factories

Data center, compute, network, storage, cloud, automation, operations and governance.

Layer 4 · Provider & Targets

Execution Plane

Hardware, hypervisors, network controllers, storage, cloud APIs, edge and isolated runners.

Declarative First

A typed target design leads; manual reality remains visible as an observation.

Plan before Apply

Cost, capacity, policies, dependencies and impact are checked before mutations.

Provider-capable, not provider-bound

Domain objects remain stable; adapters declare their actual capabilities.

Physical matters

Location, power, cabling and hardware remain part of the digital topology and failure domains.

Lab Core

Shared responsibilities keep the Factories integrable.

The Lab Core bundles the cross-cutting domain services; a Factory adds a capability without rebuilding these foundations in parallel.

1

IEL is treated as an independent microservice with its own Docker runtime.

Shared IEL function for consistent APIs, lifecycles and verifiable handovers.

2

IEL has its own Core layer for domain coordination, Factory Manager, jobs, workflows and artifact references.

Shared IEL function for consistent APIs, lifecycles and verifiable handovers.

3

IEL has its own API layer for external clients, frontend/BFF, internal Core communication and lab-to-lab communication.

Shared IEL function for consistent APIs, lifecycles and verifiable handovers.

4

IEL communicates with other Labs and the Orthevs Platform exclusively through documented APIs, events and Capability Contracts.

Shared IEL function for consistent APIs, lifecycles and verifiable handovers.

5

Every IEL Factory is a plugin of the IEL microservice, not a separate Lab microservice.

Shared IEL function for consistent APIs, lifecycles and verifiable handovers.

6

Factory plugins are installed, versioned, authorized, monitored and executed by the IEL Core through defined plugin/capability contracts.

Shared IEL function for consistent APIs, lifecycles and verifiable handovers.

Domain model and evidence

Topology and operations connect physical and digital infrastructure.

InfrastructureBlueprint, Site, Asset, Network, ComputePool, StorageService and Deployment form a coherent resource model. References retain provider identity and ownership without coupling to the internal databases of other systems.

Observations carry timestamps and freshness. An unknown or stale actual state is not interpreted as healthy. Large plans, inventory exports and Evidence are kept as referenced artifacts outside transactional metadata.

1

InfrastructureBlueprint

Topology, variables, dependencies, policies and service objectives.

2

Site & Asset

Location, rack, hardware identity, owner, support and lifecycle status.

3

NetworkService

Address spaces, DNS, routing, segmentation and connectivity contract.

4

ComputePool

Capacity, placement, accelerators, quotas and failure domain.

5

StorageService

Class, performance, replication, encryption and protection profile.

6

InfrastructureOperation

Plan digest, approval, execution, result, Evidence and recovery path.

Security, governance and operations

Infrastructure automation is only as secure as its credentials and change boundaries.

IEL separates Control Plane and Execution Plane, limits provider permissions and treats plan, apply and recovery as auditable security boundaries.

Identity

Limit provider access

Credentials are short-lived, scope-bound and never stored in Blueprints.

  • Workload identity
  • Secret broker
  • JIT and revocation
Change

Show impact in advance

Every mutation has a plan, diff, risk, approval and idempotency key.

  • Preflight and policy
  • Maintenance windows
  • Four-eyes principle for critical changes
Isolation

Constrain execution

Runners receive only the target, network and time permissions required for the specific operation.

  • Ephemeral runners
  • Egress control
  • Resource limits
Recovery

Take failure domains seriously

Redundancy counts only after tested failover and documented restore.

  • RPO/RTO per service class
  • Isolated exercises
  • Evidence and postmortem

Interplay within the Orthevs system

IEL provides reliable infrastructure capabilities for the Engineering Labs.

Other Labs do not consume provider access directly but well-scoped resource and operation contracts.

RequirementIEL PlanProvider OperationReadinessLab ConsumptionObserved State
PEL

Platform Engineering

Consumes compute, network, storage and sites for clusters and platform products.

OSEL

Operating System Engineering

Receives hardware, VM, network and storage targets for provisioning and fleet lifecycle.

AMEL

AI & ML Engineering

Uses CPU, GPU, storage and data path profiles for training and inference.

BCEL

Blockchain Engineering

Obtains node, validator, RPC and indexer infrastructure with defined failure domains.

SEL

Security Engineering

Reviews infrastructure controls, exposures and Evidence and returns security gates.

Roadmap target state

The first vertical slice connects Blueprint, inventory and real provisioning.

IEL extends provider coverage and automation only once ownership, plannability and observability have been demonstrated in the reference path. The phases are deliberately described without binding delivery dates.

  1. Phase 0Foundation

    Architecture and contracts

    Factory manifest, capability, artifact and event contracts, core API, operation ledger and security boundary.

    Exit Gate: Blueprint, plan and operation are versioned and verifiable.
  2. Phase 1Vertical Slice

    Blueprint to monitoring

    Infrastructure Blueprint, hardware inventory, DNS/IPAM, provisioning and monitoring in one end-to-end path.

    Exit Gate: a resource is created, addressed, checked and observed.
  3. Phase 2Production Readiness

    Operations and security gates

    Contract tests, packaging, scalable runners, observability, approval, backup and recovery.

    Exit Gate: errors, retries, aborts and recovery are traceable.
  4. Phase 3Cross-Lab

    Infrastructure as an Orthevs capability

    Standardized handovers to PEL, OSEL, AMEL, BCEL and SEL with ownership and events.

    Exit Gate: at least one Lab consumes IEL without database or credential coupling.
  5. Phase 4Enterprise

    Governance, resilience and scaling

    Multi-site, hybrid/edge, cost, capacity, governance, DR and advanced automation.

    Exit Gate: operating profiles and failure domains are tested and measurable.
MVP scenario

Blueprint → Inventory → DNS/IPAM → Provisioning → Monitoring

From an approved Infrastructure Blueprint, the MVP creates a clearly identified resource, assigns its network and DNS context, checks reachability and capacity, and hands it over to operations with a current observed state.

Deliberate boundaries

What the target state explicitly does not promise.

Named non-goals protect the Lab from a broad but unintegrated tool catalog and keep technical statements verifiable.

  • IEL does not replace any hypervisor, network, storage or cloud platform from scratch.
  • Provider functions count as supported only when the adapter explicitly declares and tests them.
  • A successful apply without readiness and observability evidence is not a completed infrastructure operation.
  • Destructive changes require dependency checks, data handling, approval and a recovery path.
  • Unknown or stale actual state is not presented as healthy or compliant.
  • The 48 Factories are activated in phases along real infrastructure pathways.

IEL Factory Portfolio

48 capabilities across 12 domains.

Every Factory has its own detail page covering responsibility, use cases, artifacts and contract. The catalog represents the planned capability map.

Asset, Cost & Governance

4 Factories

Cloud, Hybrid & Edge Infrastructure

4 Factories

Compute & Virtualization Infrastructure

4 Factories

Infrastructure Automation

4 Factories

Infrastructure Strategy & Architecture

4 Factories

Integration & Service Enablement

4 Factories

Network Engineering

4 Factories

Observability & Operations

4 Factories

Physical & Datacenter Infrastructure

4 Factories

Resilience & Lifecycle

4 Factories

Security & Compliance

4 Factories

Storage & Data Infrastructure

4 Factories

Shape IEL together

Which infrastructure pathway should become fully plannable first?

A data center inventory, a compute provisioning flow or a hybrid/edge pathway can be detailed as a vertical slice with clear topology, readiness and operational handover.

Orthevs – Engineering the foundation for what comes next.

Orthevs as an app

Install Orthevs

The Orthevs web app can be installed on supported mobile devices and desktop browsers.

iPhone and iPad

Open Orthevs in Safari. Tap Share, then Add to Home Screen. Enable Open as Web App if offered, then tap Add.

Android

For the web app, open the browser menu and choose Install app or Add to Home screen. Confirm the installation.

Desktop browser

Open the browser menu or the install icon in the address bar, then choose Install app or Add to Dock.

Web app installation depends on your browser. If no install prompt appears, follow the browser steps shown above.