Wiki workshop · Αγγλικά

GitOps Solution: Professional (EN)

This solution guide belongs to the assessment Professional. It does not provide one rigid answer; it defines verifiable answer criteria.

Παραδείγματα workshop σε ZIP
Πρόοδος μάθησης στη web app

Σημειώστε κεφάλαια ως αναγνωσμένα, δείτε την πρόοδο ανάγνωσης και ολοκληρώστε πρακτικές ενότητες αφού ενεργοποιήσετε την προαιρετική web app. Η πρόοδος του workshop υπολογίζεται από τα κεφάλαια όλων των σελίδων τεκμηρίωσης. Οι επιλογές μένουν σε αυτή τη συσκευή· δεν υπάρχει λογαριασμός ή συγχρονισμός με server. Δεν απαιτείται εγκατάσταση. Η ανάκληση στις Ρυθμίσεις απορρήτου διαγράφει την πρόοδο.

Πρόοδος ανάγνωσης0%
0%
0 / 6 κεφάλαια που διαβάστηκαν

Δεν υπάρχει ακόμη ελληνική έκδοση αυτού του εγγράφου. Το περιεχόμενο εμφανίζεται στα αγγλικά.

Άλλη γλωσσική έκδοσηΓερμανικά ↗Ελληνικά ↗

GitOps Solution: Professional (EN)

This solution guide belongs to the assessment Professional. It does not provide one rigid answer; it defines verifiable answer criteria.

Grading Rubric

Area Expectation
Principles Declarative, versioned, automatically pulled and continuously reconciled are applied correctly.
Evidence Answers name source, commit, rendering, controller and status evidence.
Operations Drift, promotion, rollback, multi-tenancy and observability are covered.
Security Secrets, RBAC, policy, signatures and supply chain are assessed.
01 / 06

Sample Criteria

Solution 01: Repository-Design

A strong answer for Repository-Design names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 02: Multi-Cluster

A strong answer for Multi-Cluster names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 03: Multi-Tenancy

A strong answer for Multi-Tenancy names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 04: Observability

A strong answer for Observability names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 05: Progressive Delivery

A strong answer for Progressive Delivery names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 06: Plattformbetrieb

A strong answer for Plattformbetrieb names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 07: Repository-Design

A strong answer for Repository-Design names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 08: Multi-Cluster

A strong answer for Multi-Cluster names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 09: Multi-Tenancy

A strong answer for Multi-Tenancy names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 10: Observability

A strong answer for Observability names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 11: Progressive Delivery

A strong answer for Progressive Delivery names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 12: Plattformbetrieb

A strong answer for Plattformbetrieb names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 13: Repository-Design

A strong answer for Repository-Design names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 14: Multi-Cluster

A strong answer for Multi-Cluster names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 15: Multi-Tenancy

A strong answer for Multi-Tenancy names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 16: Observability

A strong answer for Observability names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 17: Progressive Delivery

A strong answer for Progressive Delivery names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 18: Plattformbetrieb

A strong answer for Plattformbetrieb names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 19: Repository-Design

A strong answer for Repository-Design names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 20: Multi-Cluster

A strong answer for Multi-Cluster names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 21: Multi-Tenancy

A strong answer for Multi-Tenancy names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 22: Observability

A strong answer for Observability names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 23: Progressive Delivery

A strong answer for Progressive Delivery names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 24: Plattformbetrieb

A strong answer for Plattformbetrieb names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 25: Repository-Design

A strong answer for Repository-Design names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 26: Multi-Cluster

A strong answer for Multi-Cluster names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 27: Multi-Tenancy

A strong answer for Multi-Tenancy names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 28: Observability

A strong answer for Observability names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 29: Progressive Delivery

A strong answer for Progressive Delivery names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 30: Plattformbetrieb

A strong answer for Plattformbetrieb names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 31: Repository-Design

A strong answer for Repository-Design names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 32: Multi-Cluster

A strong answer for Multi-Cluster names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 33: Multi-Tenancy

A strong answer for Multi-Tenancy names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 34: Observability

A strong answer for Observability names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 35: Progressive Delivery

A strong answer for Progressive Delivery names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 36: Plattformbetrieb

A strong answer for Plattformbetrieb names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 37: Repository-Design

A strong answer for Repository-Design names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 38: Multi-Cluster

A strong answer for Multi-Cluster names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 39: Multi-Tenancy

A strong answer for Multi-Tenancy names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.

Solution 40: Observability

A strong answer for Observability names the affected GitOps source, describes the reconciliation path, separates desired and actual state and states a concrete recovery path.

  • Good evidence: Git commit, rendered manifest, Argo CD Application status, Flux condition, Kubernetes event or traceable diff.
  • Common mistake: equating GitOps with CI or enabling auto-sync without RBAC, secret and drift assessment.
  • Security expectation: no plaintext secrets, minimal controller permissions, checked signature or policy boundaries and documented incident response.
02 / 06

Review Checklist for Professional Solution

  • 01. document desired state: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 02. identify source and commit: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 03. explain reconciliation path: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 04. prove drift: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 05. check Kustomize or Helm rendering: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 06. read Argo CD or Flux resource: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 07. assess promotion risk: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 08. write down rollback path: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 09. mark secret boundary: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 10. check RBAC and tenant boundary: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 11. name policy impact: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 12. describe feedback loop: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 13. document desired state: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 14. identify source and commit: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 15. explain reconciliation path: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 16. prove drift: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 17. check Kustomize or Helm rendering: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 18. read Argo CD or Flux resource: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 19. assess promotion risk: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 20. write down rollback path: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 21. mark secret boundary: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 22. check RBAC and tenant boundary: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 23. name policy impact: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 24. describe feedback loop: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 25. document desired state: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 26. identify source and commit: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 27. explain reconciliation path: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 28. prove drift: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 29. check Kustomize or Helm rendering: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 30. read Argo CD or Flux resource: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 31. assess promotion risk: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 32. write down rollback path: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 33. mark secret boundary: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
  • 34. check RBAC and tenant boundary: record which source, commit, resource, controller and status are affected.
03 / 06

Practice Appendix: Professional Solution

This appendix provides a backlog for longer trainings, reviews and repetition. Each task is small enough to verify with local YAML artifacts and a Git repository.

A001. Repository-Design

  • Task: document desired state and explicitly relate the observation to Repository-Design.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A002. Multi-Cluster

  • Task: identify source and commit and explicitly relate the observation to Multi-Cluster.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A003. Multi-Tenancy

  • Task: explain reconciliation path and explicitly relate the observation to Multi-Tenancy.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A004. Observability

  • Task: prove drift and explicitly relate the observation to Observability.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A005. Progressive Delivery

  • Task: check Kustomize or Helm rendering and explicitly relate the observation to Progressive Delivery.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A006. Plattformbetrieb

  • Task: read Argo CD or Flux resource and explicitly relate the observation to Plattformbetrieb.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A007. GitOps

  • Task: assess promotion risk and explicitly relate the observation to GitOps.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A008. Desired State

  • Task: write down rollback path and explicitly relate the observation to Desired State.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A009. Actual State

  • Task: mark secret boundary and explicitly relate the observation to Actual State.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A010. Reconciliation

  • Task: check RBAC and tenant boundary and explicitly relate the observation to Reconciliation.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A011. Drift

  • Task: name policy impact and explicitly relate the observation to Drift.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A012. Source of Truth

  • Task: describe feedback loop and explicitly relate the observation to Source of Truth.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A013. Pull Model

  • Task: document desired state and explicitly relate the observation to Pull Model.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A014. Argo CD Application

  • Task: identify source and commit and explicitly relate the observation to Argo CD Application.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A015. Argo CD AppProject

  • Task: explain reconciliation path and explicitly relate the observation to Argo CD AppProject.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A016. Flux Source

  • Task: prove drift and explicitly relate the observation to Flux Source.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A017. Flux Kustomization

  • Task: check Kustomize or Helm rendering and explicitly relate the observation to Flux Kustomization.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A018. HelmRelease

  • Task: read Argo CD or Flux resource and explicitly relate the observation to HelmRelease.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A019. Kustomize Overlay

  • Task: assess promotion risk and explicitly relate the observation to Kustomize Overlay.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A020. Promotion

  • Task: write down rollback path and explicitly relate the observation to Promotion.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A021. Progressive Delivery

  • Task: mark secret boundary and explicitly relate the observation to Progressive Delivery.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A022. Secret Management

  • Task: check RBAC and tenant boundary and explicitly relate the observation to Secret Management.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A023. Repository-Design

  • Task: name policy impact and explicitly relate the observation to Repository-Design.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A024. Multi-Cluster

  • Task: describe feedback loop and explicitly relate the observation to Multi-Cluster.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A025. Multi-Tenancy

  • Task: document desired state and explicitly relate the observation to Multi-Tenancy.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A026. Observability

  • Task: identify source and commit and explicitly relate the observation to Observability.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A027. Progressive Delivery

  • Task: explain reconciliation path and explicitly relate the observation to Progressive Delivery.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A028. Plattformbetrieb

  • Task: prove drift and explicitly relate the observation to Plattformbetrieb.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A029. GitOps

  • Task: check Kustomize or Helm rendering and explicitly relate the observation to GitOps.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A030. Desired State

  • Task: read Argo CD or Flux resource and explicitly relate the observation to Desired State.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A031. Actual State

  • Task: assess promotion risk and explicitly relate the observation to Actual State.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A032. Reconciliation

  • Task: write down rollback path and explicitly relate the observation to Reconciliation.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A033. Drift

  • Task: mark secret boundary and explicitly relate the observation to Drift.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A034. Source of Truth

  • Task: check RBAC and tenant boundary and explicitly relate the observation to Source of Truth.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A035. Pull Model

  • Task: name policy impact and explicitly relate the observation to Pull Model.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A036. Argo CD Application

  • Task: describe feedback loop and explicitly relate the observation to Argo CD Application.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A037. Argo CD AppProject

  • Task: document desired state and explicitly relate the observation to Argo CD AppProject.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A038. Flux Source

  • Task: identify source and commit and explicitly relate the observation to Flux Source.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A039. Flux Kustomization

  • Task: explain reconciliation path and explicitly relate the observation to Flux Kustomization.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A040. HelmRelease

  • Task: prove drift and explicitly relate the observation to HelmRelease.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A041. Kustomize Overlay

  • Task: check Kustomize or Helm rendering and explicitly relate the observation to Kustomize Overlay.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A042. Promotion

  • Task: read Argo CD or Flux resource and explicitly relate the observation to Promotion.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A043. Progressive Delivery

  • Task: assess promotion risk and explicitly relate the observation to Progressive Delivery.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A044. Secret Management

  • Task: write down rollback path and explicitly relate the observation to Secret Management.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A045. Repository-Design

  • Task: mark secret boundary and explicitly relate the observation to Repository-Design.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A046. Multi-Cluster

  • Task: check RBAC and tenant boundary and explicitly relate the observation to Multi-Cluster.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A047. Multi-Tenancy

  • Task: name policy impact and explicitly relate the observation to Multi-Tenancy.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A048. Observability

  • Task: describe feedback loop and explicitly relate the observation to Observability.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A049. Progressive Delivery

  • Task: document desired state and explicitly relate the observation to Progressive Delivery.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A050. Plattformbetrieb

  • Task: identify source and commit and explicitly relate the observation to Plattformbetrieb.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A051. GitOps

  • Task: explain reconciliation path and explicitly relate the observation to GitOps.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A052. Desired State

  • Task: prove drift and explicitly relate the observation to Desired State.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A053. Actual State

  • Task: check Kustomize or Helm rendering and explicitly relate the observation to Actual State.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A054. Reconciliation

  • Task: read Argo CD or Flux resource and explicitly relate the observation to Reconciliation.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A055. Drift

  • Task: assess promotion risk and explicitly relate the observation to Drift.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A056. Source of Truth

  • Task: write down rollback path and explicitly relate the observation to Source of Truth.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A057. Pull Model

  • Task: mark secret boundary and explicitly relate the observation to Pull Model.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A058. Argo CD Application

  • Task: check RBAC and tenant boundary and explicitly relate the observation to Argo CD Application.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A059. Argo CD AppProject

  • Task: name policy impact and explicitly relate the observation to Argo CD AppProject.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A060. Flux Source

  • Task: describe feedback loop and explicitly relate the observation to Flux Source.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A061. Flux Kustomization

  • Task: document desired state and explicitly relate the observation to Flux Kustomization.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A062. HelmRelease

  • Task: identify source and commit and explicitly relate the observation to HelmRelease.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A063. Kustomize Overlay

  • Task: explain reconciliation path and explicitly relate the observation to Kustomize Overlay.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A064. Promotion

  • Task: prove drift and explicitly relate the observation to Promotion.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A065. Progressive Delivery

  • Task: check Kustomize or Helm rendering and explicitly relate the observation to Progressive Delivery.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A066. Secret Management

  • Task: read Argo CD or Flux resource and explicitly relate the observation to Secret Management.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A067. Repository-Design

  • Task: assess promotion risk and explicitly relate the observation to Repository-Design.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A068. Multi-Cluster

  • Task: write down rollback path and explicitly relate the observation to Multi-Cluster.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A069. Multi-Tenancy

  • Task: mark secret boundary and explicitly relate the observation to Multi-Tenancy.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A070. Observability

  • Task: check RBAC and tenant boundary and explicitly relate the observation to Observability.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A071. Progressive Delivery

  • Task: name policy impact and explicitly relate the observation to Progressive Delivery.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A072. Plattformbetrieb

  • Task: describe feedback loop and explicitly relate the observation to Plattformbetrieb.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A073. GitOps

  • Task: document desired state and explicitly relate the observation to GitOps.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.

A074. Desired State

  • Task: identify source and commit and explicitly relate the observation to Desired State.
  • Evidence: Write down at least one GitOps-adjacent command, one expected result and one limit of that evidence.
  • Operations question: What would a wrong assumption change in dev, staging and prod clusters?
  • Security question: Which credentials, secrets, roles, signatures or policy rules would be critical?
  • Recovery: Explain whether Git revert, sync rollback, suspend, manual drift correction or secret rotation is required.
04 / 06

Official Sources and Scope

The material is aligned with public GitOps and Kubernetes documentation. Argo CD, Flux, Kustomize, Helm, policy controllers and secret tools are positioned where they represent common GitOps workflows. An example artifact is not an installation promise for a specific cluster.

  • OpenGitOps: https://opengitops.dev/
  • OpenGitOps Principles: https://github.com/open-gitops/documents/blob/main/PRINCIPLES.md
  • Argo CD Documentation: https://argo-cd.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
  • Argo CD Declarative Setup: https://argo-cd.readthedocs.io/en/stable/operator-manual/declarative-setup/
  • Argo CD Project Page: https://argoproj.github.io/cd/
  • Flux Documentation: https://fluxcd.io/flux/
  • Flux Core Concepts: https://fluxcd.io/flux/concepts/
  • CNCF GitOps Certified Associate (CGOA): https://www.cncf.io/training/certification/cgoa/
  • Linux Foundation Certified GitOps Associate (CGOA): https://training.linuxfoundation.org/certification/certified-gitops-associate-cgoa/
05 / 06

Additional Review Drills

Use these drills when the primary task is complete and the learner needs another pass over operational reasoning. They are intentionally evidence-oriented and can be answered with local GitOps artifacts.

Drill 01: desired state

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by desired state.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 02: source commit

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by source commit.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 03: reconciliation

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by reconciliation.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 04: drift

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by drift.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 05: Argo CD Application

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by Argo CD Application.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 06: Flux Kustomization

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by Flux Kustomization.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 07: Kustomize overlay

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by Kustomize overlay.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 08: HelmRelease

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by HelmRelease.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 09: secret management

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by secret management.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 10: RBAC boundary

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by RBAC boundary.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 11: policy gate

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by policy gate.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 12: rollback

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by rollback.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 13: desired state

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by desired state.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 14: source commit

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by source commit.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 15: reconciliation

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by reconciliation.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.

Drill 16: drift

  • State which source, controller or environment is affected by drift.
  • Name one command or manifest field that produces evidence.
  • Explain what can be concluded from that evidence and what cannot be concluded from it.
  • Describe the safest recovery path for a shared GitOps platform.
06 / 06

GOP · Orthevs Academy

31 modules ως ενιαία διαδρομή μάθησης.

Η σειρά παραμένει αμετάβλητη: από τη βασική δομή του lab μέσω τεχνικών θεμελίων και λειτουργικών μοντέλων έως το τελικό troubleshooting. Τα τεχνικά ονόματα καταλόγων διατηρούνται σκόπιμα.

Orthevs – Η μηχανική ως βάση για όσα ακολουθούν.

Το Orthevs ως εφαρμογή

Εγκατάσταση του Orthevs

Η web app του Orthevs μπορεί να εγκατασταθεί σε υποστηριζόμενες κινητές συσκευές και browsers υπολογιστή.

iPhone και iPad

Ανοίξτε το Orthevs στο Safari. Πατήστε Κοινή χρήση και μετά Προσθήκη στην οθόνη αφετηρίας. Ενεργοποιήστε το Άνοιγμα ως web app, αν εμφανίζεται, και πατήστε Προσθήκη.

Android

Για τη web app, ανοίξτε το μενού του browser και επιλέξτε Εγκατάσταση εφαρμογής ή Προσθήκη στην αρχική οθόνη. Επιβεβαιώστε την εγκατάσταση.

Browser υπολογιστή

Ανοίξτε το μενού του browser ή το εικονίδιο εγκατάστασης στη γραμμή διευθύνσεων και επιλέξτε Εγκατάσταση εφαρμογής ή Προσθήκη στο Dock.

Η εγκατάσταση της web app εξαρτάται από τον browser. Αν δεν εμφανιστεί διάλογος εγκατάστασης, ακολουθήστε τα βήματα του browser που αναφέρονται παραπάνω.